Infrastructure2023

Segregated Portfolio Company — Broker Procurement

This Ospina case study documents how Carlos Rico-Ospina approached a specific risk, infrastructure, revenue, or research problem and what was built to address it.

Designed a Cayman SPC structure to scale seven-figure broker relationships across multiple brands without compounding legal overhead.

Corporate StructuringVendor ProcurementCayman SPCMarket DataRegulatory Strategy
Segregated Portfolio Company — Broker Procurement

The Problem

The business needed institutional-grade market data, order book infrastructure, and pricing feeds under large recurring contracts (seven-figure annualized, individual invoices reaching ~$600K/month). The operating model used U.S. LLCs for fee collection and offshore entities for trading environment administration—but scaling meant spinning up new offshore companies for each brand, creating unsustainable legal and operational overhead.

The Insight

The bottleneck wasn't negotiating broker terms—it was entity overhead. Each new brand triggered an expensive offshore formation cycle. The solution looked like a Series LLC concept, but offshore. That led to the Cayman analog: a Segregated Portfolio Company (SPC) where cells can be created via director resolution rather than full company formation.

What I Built

  • Researched and proposed centralized Cayman SPC structure as scaling primitive
  • Designed segregated portfolios ('cells') for each brand with practical legal separation for contracting
  • Negotiated with recognized FX counterparties to accept SPC contracting structure
  • Built standardized governance and contracting framework across all cells

Outcomes

  • Enabled repeatable broker onboarding across brands without new offshore entities each time
  • New brands supported via director resolution—turned entity expansion into operational step
  • Preserved ethical separation between fee collection and trading environment administration
  • Supported seven-figure vendor relationships with standardized governance

Why It Matters

Didn't accept entity overhead as 'the cost of doing business'—redesigned the structure so the business could scale without compounding complexity.

Cross-disciplinary solution combining vendor negotiation, regulatory framing, corporate structuring, and operational execution.

Entity and counterparty names anonymized. Structure and contracting framework verifiable upon request.

Have a Similar Challenge?

Let's discuss how I can help you achieve similar results.

Start a Conversation